Ivan Stepanovich Jastrebov

Written by Петр А. Искендеров
Ivan Stepanovich Jastrebov Ivan Stepanovich Jastrebov

1839–1894

Ivan Stepanovich Yastrebov was a Russian historian and ethnographer of the Balkans, a role he adopted as part of his diplomatic career.

Article

This began in the Asian department of the foreign ministry of the Russian empire, when he was 27 years old and a graduate of the Kazan Theological Academy. Yastrebov first trained at the Russian embassy in Constantinople, and the following year he became a secretary and dragoman (that is, a translator) of the Russian consulate in the Albanian city of Shkoder (Scutari) and soon headed the Russian delegation there. A little later, in 1870, Yastrebov took the post of vice consul in Prizren, an important political and cultural center of European Turkey, which, with good reason, was called the “Serbian Tsar’grad.” Four years later he was appointed to the Greek city of Yanina, and then again found himself in Prizren as a Russian consul. The final stage of Yastrebov’s diplomatic career was his position as Russian Consul General in Thessaloniki.

Thanks to his linguistic talent (Yastrebov mastered Albanian, Arabic, Bulgarian, Greek, Serbian and Turkish) and a natural talent for observation, he became one of the foremost experts on the Balkans and amassed an enormous amount of knowledge about the living conditions of the peoples in this region. Yastrebov understood with clarity their aspirations and concerns, as well as the subtleties of interethnic and interfaith relationships among the local population. The rich historical and ethnographic material collected by Yastrebov formed the basis of his scientific works, primary among which was “The Customs and Songs of Turkish Serbs in Prizren, Ipeka, Morava and Dabre” (St. Petersburg, 1886; three years later the book was reprinted with addenda), “Addenda for the history of the Serbian Church. From the traveler of the record-writer” (Beograd, 1879) and “Old Serbia and Albania. Travel Notes // Spomenik SKA XLI. Second razred” (Beograd, 1904). In addition, he published his correspondence and articles in Serbian and Russian journals suchas Orthodox Review, Novoye Vremya, Izvestiya of St. Petersburg Slavic Charitable Society, Glasnik Srpskog Uchenog drushtva, etc.

In his works, Yastrebov mainly focused on the problem of the ethno-confessional composition of the population in the contentious areas already claimed by various Balkan countries and rulers. Above all, it concerned Kosovo, which in the Serbian historical tradition is called “Old Serbia.” The Russian diplomat was the first to undertake a detailed analysis of the processes of Islamization and Albanization of the Orthodox Serbian population in this part of the Balkans. He emphasized that local Slavs who accepted Islam continued to observe Orthodox church holidays. Yastrebov wrote that in Prizren on the day of St. George, poturchentsy (Serbs who had converted to Islam) did not work and did not trade. This holiday in particular, he said, was the major holiday of Serbs in Kosovo: for both Orthodox and Muslims.

Yastrebov stated that for Serbs there is no more important oath than an oath to the saint considered to be the patron saint of their ancestors and their family’s descendants. Even the most destitute Serbs prepared for their patron saint’s day with special diligence and reverence, celebrating him very solemnly. In his words, the Serbs call this day “Krsno Ime” – i.e., “The name of the cross,” “Sveti” – i.e. “Holy” or simply “Glory.”

During his many years in Old Serbia and Albania, Yastrebov observed a multitude of customs and witnessed how they were performed at home and in gatherings. The celebration of the above-mentioned holiday made the strongest impression on him. In addition, he wrote that the Serbs celebrated it not just in Serbia itself, but also wherever they lived: in Austria, Hungary, Bosnia, Montenegro, on the Kosovo field, on the Morava, in the Prizren region, as well as in the Skoplen, Veles, Prilep, Bitola and Ohrid districts, Dabar, and in the vicinity of Tetovo. Yastrebov testified that all residents within these areas, excluding the Aromanians and Hellenized Wallachians, spoke the Slavic-Serbian dialect and faithfully observed this custom, which had acquired the status of a religious rite.

In Yastrebov’s estimation, the process of the Islamization of the Serbs began at the very beginning of the 19th century, when the representatives of the older generation in the Opole region communicated primarily only in Serbian. With respect to the district of Lyuma, located on the road from Prizren (Kosovo) to Central Albania, Yastrebov wrote in the 1870s that about half a century previously the Lyumlian fathers spoke Serbian. According to his statement, the names of the villages near Lyuma and Opole were Serbian.

He observed that Kosovo Serbs sometimes had two names, one Christian and the other Muslim. In the Opole region, there were few “real” Albanians, i.e., people from the central Albanian regions of Mat and Dukajin. The majority of the population were already Albanized Serbs. Yastrebov attested that about three decades earlier people usually lit a ritual bonfire in Opole on Orthodox Christmas Eve. In the village of Brod-u-Gori, according to the stories of local inhabitants, there used to be three churches, and local elders recalled how, as children, they used to go to the Church of St. Nikolas, and their parents would put candles on their ancestors’ graves at the local Orthodox cemetery.

Yastrebov called the Islamized and Albanianized Serbs “Arnauts” and believed that they differed from the “true” Albanians of Arvana – natives of the western regions of the Balkans. In pointing out the differences, he wrote that the Arnauts barely knew what honor was, they were deceitful and did not keep their word. The “real” Arvanites, however, behaved differently: they were faithful to their word, would not betray anyone and knew what honesty was. While the Arnauts toadied up to everyone, and their behavior towards the authorities was vile, hypocritical and full of pretense, the Arvanites in such circumstances behaved nobly and with dignity.

It was Yastrebov who first introduced into Russian diplomatic language and scientific use such ethnic definitions as the “internal” Serbs and Bulgarians.
The process of the Islamization of the local Serbs gave rise to complex and painful feelings in self-identification and everyday behavior. The Orthodox, he observed, tried to preserve the Serbian language until they converted to Islam. After that, the local Serbs would be ashamed to speak their native language, lest they be called a poturchenets. For this reason, such Serbs began to hate their native Serbian language. According to Yastrebov, in the Debar region, east of Korab and in the foothills of the Sharr Mountains, there were about 30 villages inhabited by Orthodox Christians who bore Serbian names but spoke Albanian. According to him, only in the village of Skurdina did the inhabitants, which included Muslims, speak Slavic Serbian.

In his work Yastrebov also paid a great deal of attention to the customs and everyday life of the people of Kosovo. Per his observation, in such relatively large cities as Pec, Prizren, Pristina and Djakovitsa, the local population had little that unified them. Christians and Muslims, he said, led reclusive lives, especially the women.

The writings of I. S. Yastrebov also contain information that allows us to assess the rate of Islamization of the Serbian population of Kosovo. Thus, in the area of the famous Serbian Orthodox monastery of Dechany, in the last twenty years of the 19th century the number of houses inhabited by Orthodox Serbs decreased by more than three times – from 165 to 50. The Russian diplomat testified that it was only by a miracle that the church survived and was never converted into a mosque.

About I. Jastrebov

  • Бован В; Jастребов у Призрену. Београд, 1983;
  • Терзич С. Русский консул И.С.Ястребов о Старой Сербии. – В: Из истории Сербии и русско-сербских связей. 1812–1912–2012. Москва, 2014.

 

×

SESDiva ERA.Net RUS Plus Call 2017 – S&T

SESDiva. Project № 156

SESDiva aims at creating a virtual museum of written culture in relation to the social, religious, cultural, and ideological environment and relations between the South and East Slavs throughout the centuries from the 11th to the beginning of the 20th century.

Duration: 2018-2020
Program: ERA.Net RUS Plus Call 2017 ‐ S&T Projects

FIND OUT MORE ERA.Net RUS Plus


TOP